Exodus 6:2–9:35
by Mandy Herson for Chabad
So
you're in the office, on the highway, or maybe even in contemplative
prayer, and it hits you: Some area of your life isn't working.
So you resolve to do better.
That sounds good, except that the resolution doesn't materialize in actual behavior modification.
But why not? Why is change so difficult?
Maybe it's because we're ingenious at outsmarting ourselves.
When
you feel dissatisfaction with your personal status quo, and can even
sense an inclination toward self-betterment, then it's easy to feel good
about your introspective honesty.
Now you can pat yourself on the back and continue on, sans change.
Why? Because, often, we don't really want to change.
Ancient Jewish texts describe this problem as a "Pharaoh Syndrome."
The
Exodus saga – with the Jews seeking liberty from the enslaving
Egyptians – is also a personal narrative. It depicts my/your continuous
struggle for freedom from our personal "Egypts" (impediments to
actualization): our fears/character flaws/inaccurate perceptions etc.
And, of course, the primary blockage to liberation is...Pharaoh; he of the – Scripturally-described – "hardened heart."
What does it mean to have a hard heart?
Pharaoh
understood that his actions were self-destructive and bringing ruin
upon his country. He even fleetingly agreed to stop the madness. But he
couldn't finalize change. Why? Because his heart wouldn't allow his
recognition to translate into behavior modification.
He knew what needed to be done, but he couldn't "close the deal."
This is the internal Pharaoh, stubbornly disregarding logical recognitions as it clings to self-destructive behavior.
Recognize him?
So, whence the salvation?
Moses, of course.
Moses
is described in our Scripture and tradition as a man of total
commitment. Brilliant as he was, he didn't guide his life by intellect
alone. He deeply felt a profound, super-rational relationship with the
Divine, and that's what guided his behavior.
The most elemental
relationships are super-rational. After all, is a parent's commitment to
a child purely rational? Should a child's commitment to parents be
purely logic-based?
No.
Mobilizing our inner Moses means
selflessly committing ourselves to our highest image, the vision of who
G‑d created us each to be. The "Moses method" is a matter of selfless
commitment, not logical calculation. This can't be challenged by the
Pharaoh Syndrome, which prevents the expression of our logical
resolutions.
Simply put: The Moses method is a much deeper expression of self, and it's "working a different wavelength."
Here's
the bottom line: Sometimes, life's richness is reached when we can step
beyond the limitations of the mind, following the soul's lead and
expression.
So the next time you resolve to change your behavior,
see it as a part of your commitment to G‑d, see it as an exercise of
your relationship with your Destiny, see it as an expression of your
very reason for existence.
Then see if excuses can block your way.
Pharaoh couldn't.
No comments:
Post a Comment